Trade Stocks for Real
I read a remark by a forum member on another land site earlier today that suggested that every investor should back prove their system for at least twenty years. I differ and will now state you why. Back testing and paper trading look to be the most over emphasized techniques offered by market theorists, educational elite, market novitiates and/or market fakes. While learning the pure basics, I can see why a novitiate investor may desire to paper trade; to see the consequences of the development system but I will warn that these consequences are completely false. The consequences will not incorporate the emotional determinations that spell along with risking your ain cash. Anyone and I intend anyone can paper trade successfully. Its simple, topographic point a trade and hope it travels up and if it doesnt, you have got no concerns because you cant lose. The emotional imbalance that happens when you really begin to lose money is not present. Dont sap yourself by believing the consequences of your paper trading or practical computer simulation portfolio. These things may give you some assurance in your system but they dont turn out a darn thing in the existent world. The existent world, specifically the stock market, is run by emotional human beings. People do determinations that are irrational and alkali their trading determinations on fearfulness and greed. Paper trading misses fearfulness and greed because there is no addition and no loss; therefore there is no effect to deal with.
Dont concern about dorsum testing for 20 old age because historical back testing is never very accurate. The most accurate testing is existent time. If you can back prove existent trades (actual trades that you have got made in the past), then this would be just as good as existent clip testing (or forward testing). Back testing tin get you somewhat of an thought of how your system will execute but there is no emotional attachments to this type of testing so it is not realistically accurate. We all cognize emotions are tied to our determinations in the markets so we can only get accurate consequences through existent testing. Learn to disregard the talking caputs and the people on television and that internet confabulate room that claim they are up over 1000% trading a fake account. What really do me express joy is the individual that sets up a practical trading scenario and then allows each participant to merchandise $500,000 or more than in their account. If you are going to merchandise a fake account, at least maintain it existent so you seek to learn something, maybe money management.
I apparatus 1 practical trading competition a few old age back and I only allowed each participant to begin with $10,000, a sensible amount, an amount that most people begin trading with. The competition was merriment but it was not existent for me or the others. I didnt care what put on the line I took and I never had a problem pulling the trigger which makes go on in existent life. I did seek to maintain my trades in line with my existent life account but it varied slightly. I witnessed other bargainers making 20 trades per twenty-four hours or 20-50 trades per week. This is not existent because the committees alone, even with a price reduction broker will pass over you out. I did allow border because I utilize border in my account but I saw other investors abusing the fake powerfulness of border in their practical account, again, playing the game for merriment instead of learning something valuable. As a fellow investor, maintain testing your system in existent clip and you will cognize what works and what doesnt based on existent trades, not simulations. Professors and the similar learn theories while investors actually make the trading! Back testing may convert some people but I am only convinced with what works now, in existent time. Besides, why would I waste material my clip playing for fake money when I can learn and make for real? Back testing may be good for some people but I have got been testing my systems in existent clip since the twenty-four hours I started investing seriously. Currently, I am testing the $60-$100 theory using options in my latest account. I will not have got concrete information on this system for another twelvemonth or two, most likely two old age down the road. I could back prove the system but how will that aid me realistically going forward? It wont, it may demo me some chances and the possible anticipation of the system but it wont warrant anything until I put a place for real.
If you desire to prove a system, unfastened an account with existent money, even a minimum amount and give it a try. Brand certain you utilize enough money to allow emotions to be attached to your decisions. Without the emotional attachment, you are cheating yourself and your possible system.